The US Steel Industry in 2004: Still in Need of Protection?
|
|
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
Case Details:
Case Code : ECON006
Case Length : 20 Pages
Period : 2001 - 2004
Pub Date : 2004
Teaching Note :Not Available Organization : Steel
Industry : -
Countries : USA
To download The US Steel Industry in 2004: Still in Need of Protection? case study (Case Code:
ECON006) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 600;
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 600 + Rs. 25 for Shipping &
Handling Charges
»
Economics
Case Studies » Case Studies Collection » ICMR Home
» Short Cases Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info » How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies
» Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
<< Previous
"That will give the US steel industry the opportunity to get back on its
feet."
- Robert Zoellick, US Trade Representative, commenting on president
Bush's tariff measures announced in March 20021.
Struggling US Steel Industry
Since the late 1960s, the US steel industry has been
asking for protection from imports and subsidies to help alleviate its
troubles. And the US government has, in response, enacted various
protectionist measures from time to time. In 2001, President George W
Bush announced the Steel Program. It consisted of three parts:
negotiations with trading partners to eliminate inefficient excess
capacity in the steel industry worldwide; negotiations with trading
partners to eliminate the distorting practices including subsidies that
resulted in excess capacity; and, investigation under Section 201 to
determine whether the industry was harmed by low-priced steel imports. |
|
After the investigation by the U.S. International Trade
Commission (USITC) was completed in March 2002, the President imposed tariff
measures under Section 201 to help domestic producers to compete with imported
steel.
|
Trade economists argued that these measures would
hamper the competitiveness of the industry. The government's
protectionist policies would adversely affect market efficiency and
innovation in the industry. Imposition of Section 201 tariff measures
would increase government intervention in an industry that was already
protected, they felt. Statistics show that 80% of steel imports to the
US were already subject to tariffs under the US antidumping laws. These
laws allowed the government to impose tariffs on steel products that
were subsidized by foreign governments and dumped in the US. But in
spite of being protected, the industry was struggling. |
In December 2003, the US administration lifted Section 201
tariff measures, thus, avoiding a trade war with European Union and Asian
countries for the time being.
The US Steel Industry in 2004: Still in Need of Protection?
- Next Page>>
|
|